On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alexandru Petrescu<[email protected]> wrote: > Brian Frank a écrit : >> >> I think an UDP-based application level protocol that works well over >> 6LoWPANs and with sleeping nodes is a sorely lacking feature. However, I am >> not sure SNMP is the best starting point. > > Is there a MIB (Management Information Base) effort for 6LoWPAN ND? It may > be too early... but MIB is necessary. >
6LoWPAN MIB has already been there for a while. IPv6 ND options are currently a part of IP-MIB likewise 6LoWPAN ND options may be added to the 6LoWPAN MIB when the 6LoWPAN ND is finalized. However, a separate MIB module may be needed for the white board data structure as pointed out by Carsten. > Alex > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Hamid Mukhtar <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Carsten, >> SNMP based network management is also critical for 6LoWPANs. If the >> working group is considering rechartering soon, this meeting >> would be a nice time to discuss that too. >> Regards, >> Hamid >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lowpan mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > Hamid _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
