On the other hand, I can't
find anything that explictly allows this.
So it's not allowed in the current text.
I agree it would be easy to add.
Do you see any
difficulty with piggybacking RFRAG-ACKs on other packets?
That would mean my proposal to compress FRACKs by simply not sending
trailing zero bytes would not work.
Solution:
1) adopt another one of Pascal's recent proposals for FRACK
compression (A/B/B-reverse)
2) Simply don't compress the 32-bit field in the piggy-back case.
Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan