From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:45:10 +0200
> Do you see any
> difficulty with piggybacking RFRAG-ACKs on other packets?
That would mean my proposal to compress FRACKs by simply not sending
trailing zero bytes would not work.
Solution:
1) adopt another one of Pascal's recent proposals for FRACK
compression (A/B/B-reverse)
2) Simply don't compress the 32-bit field in the piggy-back case.
Piggybacked FRACKs was the only reason I thought of for why
it would be worth compressing FRACKs, which is what started
me looking to see if doing so was allowed. That being said,
even with piggybacked FRACKs I still don't think compessing
FRACKs is worth the added complexity.
-Richard Kelsey
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
