I thought so but then, you need to wait for the ack back to piggy back. 6LoWPAN sublayer cannot know that such a thing is expected. This is why I proposed an alternate use case while suggesting -for you case- not to wait too long.
Pascal >-----Original Message----- >From: Richard Kelsey [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: jeudi 25 juin 2009 16:43 >To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: piggybacked fragment ACKs > > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:44:20 +0200 > From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[email protected]> > > Note: I would not delay (too much?) the FRACK just to be able to > piggy back. > >The use case I care about is when the fragmented message is >a data query that generates an immediate response. >Putting the FRACK in with the response doesn't add any >delay. > -Richard Kelsey _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
