Alex, On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > > Er? > > I can see here two disagreements: > > (1) AUTOCONF document draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-00.txt is not > such a big consensus you make it sound like. To me there seem to > be disagreements on at least one issue: link-local addresses. Which > brings point 2 below.
I have to disagree. While you personally may not like this document, the AUTOCONF WG chairs have sensed a consensus of the WG on that document. Also, some issues about the draft that have been raised (notably the text about LLs), have been solved during the AUTOCONF meeting by proposing modifications of the text. The minutes of AUTOCONF will certainly be released soon. That said, the discussion about consensus of an AUTOCONF draft is probably of no concern for 6lowpan, so this will be my only response to that topic on this mailing list. > [...] Ulrich _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
