Ulrich Herberg a écrit :
Alex,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Er?
I can see here two disagreements:
(1) AUTOCONF document draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-00.txt is not
such a big consensus you make it sound like. To me there seem to
be disagreements on at least one issue: link-local addresses. Which
brings point 2 below.
I have to disagree. While you personally may not like this document,
the AUTOCONF WG chairs have sensed a consensus of the WG on that
document. Also, some issues about the draft that have been raised
(notably the text about LLs), have been solved during the AUTOCONF
meeting by proposing modifications of the text. The minutes of
AUTOCONF will certainly be released soon. That said, the discussion
about consensus of an AUTOCONF draft is probably of no concern for
6lowpan, so this will be my only response to that topic on this
mailing list.
Ulrich, ok.
What do you think about the 2nd point? (the fact that
draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-00.txt talks differently about LLs
than draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-07.txt does)
Alex
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
