On Mar 4, 2010, at 00:00, Geoff Mulligan wrote: >> From what I can tell we appear to be closing in on the idea (from Daniel > plus others) that the HC draft should only: > - Allocate a new dispatch value for the "changed" frag offset and > length value > - Define the frag offset and length to be the values relevant for the > actual data in the packet (compresses or not) > - Strongly deprecate the old frag dispatch value > > Agree or disagree?
I personally believe 4944's fragmentation is fine. I must have missed a lot of discussion if the above is the resolution. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
