On Mar 4, 2010, at 13:21, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > [Pascal] Agreed, as long as the restriction applies to the existing > fragmentation (4944). We cannot presume that this restriction will still > be required for upcoming methods. > It will be up to those new methods to specify whether they need that > restriction or not.
Absolutely! I was trying to talk about 4944 fragmentation. (But then, again, I believe that the ability to independently decompress/recompress headers in single fragments is a major win that other fragmenters might want to benefit from.) Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
