On Mar 4, 2010, at 14:09 , Carsten Bormann wrote: >> We could explicitly state, for clarity, that you MUST NOT compress >> anything outside the first fragment, > > That is a nice editorial clarification. > I'm in favor of adding that.
Yep, this is the minimum required. Now we seem to be split on whether we need more than this. Personally I can live with the above as this is clearly the fastest way to move this draft to the IESG, but I don't have problems with the fix suggested by Anders. How about we try to reach consensus by Friday afternoon, if we can't agree to agree, then we can always use this clarification. It would be sooo nice to have HC already to the IESG so we can concentrate on getting ND done in Anaheim ;-) Zach -- http://www.sensinode.com http://zachshelby.org - My blog "On the Internet of Things" http://6lowpan.net - New book - "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet" Mobile: +358 40 7796297 Zach Shelby Head of Research Sensinode Ltd. Kidekuja 2 88610 Vuokatti, FINLAND This e-mail and all attached material are confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your system without producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof. _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
