I support this fine document. One question : is it mandatory to implement all HC encoding/decoding for all the cases defined in this draft? Does it plan to handle any error code when one implementation supports the full draft and the other one partially and the lowpan-hc encoded packet is not fully understood by the recipient.
Would like to see this point clarified in the draft. Thanks, -Samita > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Geoff Mulligan > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:03 PM > To: 6lowpan > Subject: [6lowpan] WGLC for 6lowpan HC draft > > As there some discussion and changes to the HC draft we will have one more > LC for the HC draft. I think think that we need 4 weeks so I proposed that > this LC will last one week. > > This note formally starts the WG Last Call for comments on draft-ietf- > 6lowpan-hc-07, "Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams in 6LoWPAN Networks". > > The document can be found at: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-07.txt > > The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the IESG > for publication as a Standards Track document. > > Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your comments > to the 6lowpan list. Please also indicate in your response whether or not > you think this document is ready to go to the IESG. > > This Last Call will end Wednesday May 31 2010 at 2359 UTC. > > Thanks, > Geoff > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
