Dear Pascal, all.

I fully support the 2 points.

regards,
Xavi

2015-04-30 1:46 GMT+02:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]>:

>  Dear all :
>
>
>
> After the interim call on Friday , we reviewed the discussions on minimal
> and found that we are ready to ship the draft to the IESG.
>
>
>
> The only questions left are:
>
> 1) should we provide a default value for K1 in the security section?
>
> 2) which IEEE document should the spec reference?
>
>
>
> For 1) it was suggested that it would help interop if we did. So the
> proposal on the table is to add a well-known key as a default that can be
> modified at commissioning time.
>
> For 2) the spec makes explicit references deep into 802.15.4e so the
> proposal on the table is to maintain the reference to 802.15.4e as it
> stands now.
>
>
>
> We are now calling for consensus on these 2 points. If you object please
> let us know and we’ll talk. We’ll conclude this call next Friday.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to