Pascal, +1 on both points Thomas On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all : > > > > After the interim call on Friday , we reviewed the discussions on minimal > and found that we are ready to ship the draft to the IESG. > > > > The only questions left are: > > 1) should we provide a default value for K1 in the security section? > > 2) which IEEE document should the spec reference? > > > > For 1) it was suggested that it would help interop if we did. So the > proposal on the table is to add a well-known key as a default that can be > modified at commissioning time. > > For 2) the spec makes explicit references deep into 802.15.4e so the > proposal on the table is to maintain the reference to 802.15.4e as it > stands now. > > > > We are now calling for consensus on these 2 points. If you object please > let us know and we’ll talk. We’ll conclude this call next Friday. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Pascal > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > >
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
