Hi Pascal,
After the discussion in the thread "Removing the "e" in the charter", do you
still ask agreement about solution on the second point?
Personally, I prefer the text suggested by Pat, because it can decouple 6TiSCH
from IEEE802.15.4 MAC. But, if the minimal draft is not final standard, I will
agree the current solution for point 2.
ThanksQin
On Friday, May 1, 2015 7:21 AM, Thomas Watteyne
<[email protected]> wrote:
Pascal,+1 on both pointsThomas
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]>
wrote:
Dear all : After the interim call on Friday , we reviewed the discussions on
minimal and found that we are ready to ship the draft to the IESG. The only
questions left are:1) should we provide a default value for K1 in the security
section?2) which IEEE document should the spec reference? For 1) it was
suggested that it would help interop if we did. So the proposal on the table is
to add a well-known key as a default that can be modified at commissioning
time.For 2) the spec makes explicit references deep into 802.15.4e so the
proposal on the table is to maintain the reference to 802.15.4e as it stands
now. We are now calling for consensus on these 2 points. If you object please
let us know and we’ll talk. We’ll conclude this call next Friday. Cheers, Pascal
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
