|
Pat, I agree with you completely. In my experience, many contributors to standards believe it to be their job to guide a reader into finding material in a normative reference by citing specific 'chapter and verse", or in this case detailed subclause numbering, when instead they should be indicating the topic area and specific information that is of importance. Standards that call out lots of specific subclauses by number are a nightmare to maintain, particularly if they reference more than one other normative standard in such detail, because they necessarily need to be updated whenever ANY of those cited-in-detail normative references are updated. If the writer of such clauses was told that they would be devoting one week per year for the rest of their lives to maintaining and updating all the detailed references that they included, it seems likely that they would find ways to word the text that did not so encumber their future. -Tom ===== On 2015.04.30 15:13, Pat Kinney wrote:
Qin; |
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
