+1 I think it says is all.
Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: 6tisch [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kris Pister > Sent: mardi 5 mai 2015 23:47 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [6tisch] proposed text for minimal security > > This is my proposed text for all of section 8. This does not force anyone to > use > well-known keys, or 32 bit MICs, or send EBs unencrypted. > It does make it easy to do interop. > People who want to use pre-configured secret keys, long MICs, encrypted EBs, > or no keys at all, are free to do so. > > ksjp > --------------- > 8. Security > Minimal assumes the existence of two keys, K1 and K2. EBs MAY be > authenticated with key K1 using security level 1 (32 bit MIC). > DATA, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, and MAC COMMAND frame types SHOULD be > authenticated with key K2 using security level 1. > > For early interoperability, K1 MAY be set to "6TiSCH minimal15". K2 SHOULD be > a randomly generated high entropy cryptographic key. > Key distribution is out of scope. EBs MAY be filtered based on PANID. > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
