Alper Yegin wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > I thought the discussion centered more around the transport stack for the > "authentication method" and key management. Hence the discussion about using > EAP/PANA, CoAP, etc. > > Whether the auth method will be cert based, or PSK based, etc. is indeed very > important. But whatever it is determined to be, there'd already be an > existing EAP method, or one can define an alternative encapsulation/transport > if using a non-EAP solution.
Right. I was trying to understand how much overhead PANA+EAP+EAPmethodX would add to what is needed in the abstract exchanges for auth method Y. > I recommend we open another thread just to discuss the type of credentials > and the associated auth method to be used. > Once we converge on that, we can come back and discuss how to transport that. That is probably also a useful exercise. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
