Alper, I have not read the thread, but I'm trying to understand your suggestion.
PANA and EAP are only carriers for EAP methods. So the real question is: Which EAP method is going to be used? If an existing method fits the bill, that would be interesting to know. If a new method has to be designed, I would like to understand what the effect is of having to phrase that method in EAP terms (e.g., as opposed to directly using that exchange e.g. via 6top). Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
