Hello Michael: This could be a separate milestone but ultimately the text will be useful in the security piece of the architecture. Why wouldn't we write it that way as opposed to separately?
Cheers, Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: 6tisch [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson > Sent: jeudi 5 novembre 2015 00:19 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Malisa Vucinic <[email protected]>; Rafa Marin Lopez <[email protected]>; > Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [6tisch] Directions on the join process > > > It seems to me that we need to write a document that explains the join > *environment* in terms of radio and energy considerations. > Some of this discussion happened orally in security design team discussions, > but > was perhaps assumed to be well known, or was simply assumed. > > Pascal: should this be a new milestone? > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= > IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
