> On 02 Nov 2015, at 12:30, Rafa Marin Lopez <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I think we are aligned. That is why we proposed EAP over CoAP (you reuse > CoAP). And as Robert mentioned certain EAP methods can re-use source code. > > On the other hand, I have some doubts this source code will be used only once.
Could you elaborate? > EAP-AKA has two messages + EAP Success : EAP-Req/AKA (4 bytes header EAP + 1 > the type) + EAP-Resp/AKA (4 bytes header EAP +1 the type) + EAP success(4 > bytes) = 14 overhead with respect to running “AKA" without EAP. Ok thanks. So, am I right if I say that this will trigger 3 additional frames at L2 with additional CoAP / UDP-6LoWPAN-IPv6 / 15.4 overhead? _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
