Ralph Droms writes: > Seems to me this document could easily be a working group document. > Why have you decided to publish it as AD sponsored document?
As this will allocate number for the IETF, not for just one WG, the authors though it would be better to get as wide coverage for it, meaning having longer last call time, and advertising it in several different working groups (who might use it in the future), instead of having it for one WG draft in some WG. Also it was not clear which WG it should be in. I think 6tisch is the one who might need it first, but 6lo is most likely also going to using it etc. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
