Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > meaning having longer last call time, and advertising it in several > different working groups (who might use it in the future), instead of > having it for one WG draft in some WG.
> Also it was not clear which WG it should be in. I think 6tisch is the
> one who might need it first, but 6lo is most likely also going to
> using it etc.
This makes me ask a question about 802.15.9: would a new KMP created by the
IETF for 15.9 (such as OSCOAP or DTLS) need to use an IE under this subtype?
Or does 15.9 have it's own registry, and if so would we need different liason
request for that?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
