> -----Original Message----- > From: 6lo [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:12 AM > To: Ralph Droms > Cc: Internet Area; [email protected]; [email protected]; Suresh Krishnan; iot- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 6lo; 6tisch > Subject: Re: [6lo] [6tisch] AD sponsoring draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-02 > > Ralph Droms writes: > > Seems to me this document could easily be a working group document. > > Why have you decided to publish it as AD sponsored document? > > As this will allocate number for the IETF, not for just one WG, the authors > though it would be better to get as wide coverage for it, meaning having > longer last call time, and advertising it in several different working groups > (who might use it in the future), instead of having it for one WG draft in > some WG. > > Also it was not clear which WG it should be in. I think 6tisch is the one who > might need it first, but 6lo is most likely also going to using it etc. > -- > [email protected] >
The last argument is relatively easy to overcome. As both 6tisch and 6lo belong in the INT area, this could be a good candidate for a intarea WG document. I also have a slight preference for this path, as a WG document has typically a better level of scrutiny and review. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
