Hell Peter The document also indicates when to encaps and which artifacts are needed. Whereas 6LoRH describes how to compress the artifacts and the encaps. An annex somewhere that captures the resulting shape of the packets is of great help for implementers. I think it does not hurt as annex, all the contrary.
Take care, Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Roll [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of peter van der Stok Sent: mardi 18 juillet 2017 10:30 To: Ines Robles <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>; roll <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Roll] [6tisch] Suggestion to add Example Packets for 6TiSCH Configuration into useofrplinfo draft Hi Ines, I don't see the relation between the examples and the rplinfo draft. RPLinfo is about routes through the DODAG and the use of IP-in-IP and RPI. The examples do not reflect that topic in my opinion. Peter Ines Robles schreef op 2017-07-18 10:19: > Dear all, > > Yesterday at 6tisch meeting was suggested to add this document, > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-munoz-6tisch-examples-02 > > as an Appendix section in useofrplinfo draft. > > We would like to know your opinion on that, > > - Should we add this draft as an appendix? or > > - Should this draft be presented in lwig? or > > - Additional Suggestions? > > Thank you, > > The authors. > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
