Thomas Watteyne <[email protected]> wrote: > Thinking about it, I believe it's better to keep > draft-munoz-6tisch-examples as a standalone document. I will be easier > to maintain, compared to splitting the contents across multiple drafts, > or worse, replicating the contents in multiple drafts.
I don't mind leaving it seperate. I suggest that a well curated wiki would work best here, at least in the short term. Given that the IESG is pulling back on the number of non-standards track documents they want to process, I think that would better. But perhaps we will still want to grab a few example packets both uncompressed and compressed for useofrplinfo. (There is a reason to implement uncompressed RPI, which is because you extend the RPL DODAG across non-constrained media) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
