Well Pascal,
The authors should decide, but I recommend some structuring and
additional text.
Peter
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) schreef op 2017-07-18 15:23:
Hell Peter
The document also indicates when to encaps and which artifacts are
needed. Whereas 6LoRH describes how to compress the artifacts and the
encaps.
An annex somewhere that captures the resulting shape of the packets is
of great help for implementers. I think it does not hurt as annex, all
the contrary.
Take care,
Pascal
-----Original Message-----
From: Roll [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of peter van der
Stok
Sent: mardi 18 juillet 2017 10:30
To: Ines Robles <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>; roll <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6tisch] Suggestion to add Example Packets for
6TiSCH Configuration into useofrplinfo draft
Hi Ines,
I don't see the relation between the examples and the rplinfo draft.
RPLinfo is about routes through the DODAG and the use of IP-in-IP and
RPI.
The examples do not reflect that topic in my opinion.
Peter
Ines Robles schreef op 2017-07-18 10:19:
Dear all,
Yesterday at 6tisch meeting was suggested to add this document,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-munoz-6tisch-examples-02
as an Appendix section in useofrplinfo draft.
We would like to know your opinion on that,
- Should we add this draft as an appendix? or
- Should this draft be presented in lwig? or
- Additional Suggestions?
Thank you,
The authors.
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
