On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a new user-level file server a month ago,
> something I hadn't done in years, and I did it on Linux,
> using lib9p backed by 9pfuse.  It was an entirely pleasant
> experience.

 Speaking of 9pfuse - I've just pulled and the version distributed
with p9p is still not going to work on linux/x86_64. I posted a patch
for this[1], though 9fans.net doesn't appear to archive attachments -
see http://sqweek.dnsdojo.org/tmp/9pfuse.LARGEFILE.diff
 Also, I've sent you a couple of emails off-list recently about a bug
in 9p(1). I can't think of anything I might have done to offend you,
so I'm assuming they've been marked as spam or otherwise waylaid -
should I just post the patch to 9fans?
 If you did get the patch and have just been thinking about it, then
my apologies for being impatient. That scenario just seems
increasingly unlikely :)

[1] http://9fans.net/archive/2008/03/530

-sqweek

Reply via email to