On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, I've sent you a couple of emails off-list recently about a bug >> in 9p(1). I can't think of anything I might have done to offend you, >> so I'm assuming they've been marked as spam or otherwise waylaid - >> should I just post the patch to 9fans? >> If you did get the patch and have just been thinking about it, then >> my apologies for being impatient. That scenario just seems >> increasingly unlikely :) > > Done. > > The patch you sent had to do with Unix signals, > so I had been putting off having to think about it.
Hah, fair enough! Thanks, but I shouldn't have rushed you - the modified patch doesn't work. writen() never returns anything less than 0. I don't really follow its purpose either - at first I thought it was there to account for an interrupted syscall, but the implementation differs from what I would expect for that. -sqweek
