> Speaking of 9pfuse - I've just pulled and the version distributed > with p9p is still not going to work on linux/x86_64. I posted a patch > for this[1], though 9fans.net doesn't appear to archive attachments - > see http://sqweek.dnsdojo.org/tmp/9pfuse.LARGEFILE.diff
Done. > Also, I've sent you a couple of emails off-list recently about a bug > in 9p(1). I can't think of anything I might have done to offend you, > so I'm assuming they've been marked as spam or otherwise waylaid - > should I just post the patch to 9fans? > If you did get the patch and have just been thinking about it, then > my apologies for being impatient. That scenario just seems > increasingly unlikely :) Done. The patch you sent had to do with Unix signals, so I had been putting off having to think about it. Russ
