I wrote a functional 9P S3 client but it just seemed silly in the end. Buy a few T of disk and fossil+venti and it's over. Even aging kenfs will do.
brucee On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2008, at 4:11 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: >> >> It seems that MS is pushing webdav hard. > > True. But it is not MS that worries me in this particular case. At least > they don't have anything to offer yet. This: > http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/2006-03-01/ > on the other hand, seems to be getting a lot of traction. As in > "people are using it right now" kind of traction. > > I wish these guys provided 9P as one of the options to access their > remote storage resources, but, of course, they don't. And why > would they -- FUSE can handle whatever they have perfectly well. > > Thus, the letter of the "remote resource access via FS semantics" > law seems to be perfectly fine, while the spirit, of course, is hopelessly > broken. > > Thanks, > Roman. > >
