> And we do have a sword hanging over our heads: we've got to get Plan 9 > on the top 500 in 2009 or the DOE aspect of this may all go bust. So > you're looking at 9 years (feels like 90!) of pushing on strings with > a pretty hard deliverable next year.
Could you elaborate on "the top 500"? And why is the community only alerted now to this potentially very clear objective? I'm sure we'd all want to be of help rather than hindrance in such a situation? ++L
