On Thu Dec 18 06:44:58 EST 2008, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:47 PM, <lu...@proxima.alt.za> wrote: > >> Or, for that matter, evaluate the risk of releasing it prematurely? > > > > What risk? > > Untested and/or incomplete kernel changes?
i don't think that's the main risk, though that is still a problem, and a current problem. in my view, plan 9 is great because you can change it easily. but i'm not sure that means that every change needs to be made cannonical, especially if the result is harder to change. - erik
