I use kfs on a standalone Plan 9 box. The computer has a 100 MHz CPU with some 48 MB RAM. fossil hogs all processing power. kfs on the other hand is wonderfully stable and low maintenance.
Plus, the code is beautiful. The install procedure from CD involved manually going through the install commands. The install scripts are easy to read and figure out. Just make your partition and use the install scripts as a guide for copying stuff over from the CD onto kfs disk. That's all to it. Best, ak On 5/16/10, Corey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm thinking about going through another installation, and I'm wondering > whether there's usefulness in undertaking a standalone terminal install > using only kfs rather than fossil? And if so, how is this currently done? > > As far as I can tell, I'd want to use Erik's 9atom iso - which seems to > support Ken's fs (http://www.quanstro.net/plan9/9atom/index.html)? - > but the current install scripts only prompt for fossil or fossil+venti. > > >
