On 5/16/10, Richard Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> For me, those two factors alone make up for any disparity in
> performance.

I use it with these limitations (though, as is mentioned above,
the former can be trivially changed) almost daily. But I have
an interface to a (remote) Ken FS server for backups when
I need to make them. And usually some synthetic filesystem
can be used to deal with renaming the files. Yeah, there are
constraints there, but if it becomes too troublesome, see above.

Consider the sort of system mentioned. The performance turns
out to be so poor that these factors are not nearly enough
compensation. If there were happy endings... well, maybe, but
I still couldn't get work done.


Best,
ak

Reply via email to