> The computer has a 100 MHz CPU with > some 48 MB RAM. fossil hogs all > processing power. kfs on the other hand > is wonderfully stable and low maintenance.
kfs limits filenames to 28 characters, which can be a source of irritation if you import files or save mail attachments from other systems. fossil (even without venti) gives you snapshots, which can be very useful if you ever make mistakes. For me, those two factors alone make up for any disparity in performance.
