> after looking at the source, i'd say nanosleep is the least of your troubles.
You think that once it compiles, it will not work as required? I have not looked very deeply under the bonnet, so I must have missed important details. ++L
> after looking at the source, i'd say nanosleep is the least of your troubles.
You think that once it compiles, it will not work as required? I have not looked very deeply under the bonnet, so I must have missed important details. ++L