You guys does not take the End-user into account at all.
On 7/16/13, Skip Tavakkolian <[email protected]> wrote:
> when discussing "good" and "evil", thought experiment proofs are the only
> thing anyone can offer.
>
> I should have prefaced what i said with: "if you insist on assigning
> goodness or wickedness to things, then it follows that any large, all
> encompassing ...".
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Kurt H Maier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:07:38PM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
>> > the nature of any large, all encompassing thing is to be good and evil
>> all
>> > at the same time. proof: imagine a company (Google, Microsoft, Oracle,
>> GE,
>> > etc.) that spans the universe. your perception of whether that thing is
>> > mostly good or mostly evil is a reflection of your belief about the
>> nature
>> > of the universe.
>> >
>>
>> this is what passes for proof these days?
>>
>>
>
