I looked at proto, they are just state machines pretending to be threads (imho) - not my style.
libtask for me, I hope I can slice it a little and put the non-bear-metal bits in seperate files so I can offer the changes back. co routines plus channels is exactly what I want. -Steve > On 9 Jul 2015, at 16:58, Joseph Stewart <joseph.stew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One other thing that I've looked at but never used is Adam Dunkels' > "protothreads" (http://dunkels.com/adam/pt/) although you'd still need to > roll your own channel library. > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net> wrote: >> The system I am trying to add libtask to has no runtime other than libc. >> >> Corrently it is an even based system that uses a "min main loop" and >> a twisty maze of nested state machines that all look the same. >> >> Hence my desire to add co-routines + channels (i.e. exactly what libtask is) >> to it. I have no need for the file or network modules but those are easily >> removed. >> >> I don't have the context calls but I do have setjmp/longjmp so that is what I >> am trying to use. >> >> I will shout if it works out. >> >> -Steve >