that makes sense. thanks. On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:38 AM Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4 February 2017 at 01:56, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Shutting down the write-end (i.e. 'shut_wr'), should send FIN, and > transition to Finwait1. > > > i'd make it a "read" or "write" parameter to the existing "hangup" > message. older implementations that don't accept the parameter will give an > error on the request because the current tcp.c doesn't accept a parameter >