that makes sense. thanks.

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:38 AM Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On 4 February 2017 at 01:56, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Shutting down the write-end (i.e. 'shut_wr'), should send FIN, and
> transition to Finwait1.
>
>
> i'd make it a "read" or "write" parameter to the existing "hangup"
> message. older implementations that don't accept the parameter will give an
> error on the request because the current tcp.c doesn't accept a parameter
>

Reply via email to