An example:
typedef struct {
....
arch_vcpu_info_t arch;
} vcpu_info_t;
For x86_32 and x86_64 arch_vcpu_info_t is defined as:
typedef struct {
} arch_vcpu_info_t;
Lucho
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 07:36:58PM -0700, David Leimbach said:
> On 7/2/05, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>it cant be worked around without breaking the cross
> > >>platform features of their headers.
> >
> > sounds brilliantly portable to me.
> > what do they do? insert 0-length padding areas
> > to make these structures `portable'?
> >
> >
> Yeah, it's undefined what happens if a struct is empty in C99. Seems a
> really silly thing for someone to rely on. What are they trying to
> accomplish? The only thing I can think of is some kind of type safety
> based on a tag generated for a unique "struct". They should probably
> make it wrap a void * or something.
