On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> i don't understand. if it's in the portability interface, you say what > arch_vcpu_info_t is, so why not typedef int arch_vcpu_info_t; and be > done with it. i don't see why it must be a struct in that context. As I understand it, current Linux practice is to not use typedefs. So, that approach will not go. ron
