On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> Yeah, well -- sorta. You probably have a better understanding of the > way Xen does stuff than I do. I guess in the current context that is > exactly what they would correspond to, but in a 9P-based world, you > would only need a single channel. You would mount the exported > private namespace containing the devices allocated to your partition > over that channel (instead of individually mounting disk, network, > etc.) that's not real xen-device-compatible, but let's go with it for now, just to get proof-of-concept going. ron
