On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> But I thought that was the whole point - to convince them to use 9P for > resource sharing versus the current stuff. Using 9P for transport alone > just doesn't make sense to me -- let's sell them the whole enchilada. you'll lose on the performance front. I'd still like to be able to walk to a resource in the kernel and get a channel for it, and then use channel reads and writes in the kernel to write the fifo queues. Right now, you use a dedicated driver (which is how you name it -- you know the driver to use) and drive the fifo queues. ah, this is too hard in email. What's the next conference you're going to? :-) ron
