> I don't know that anyone is using the mh Mail program
> but me, but I'm happy with it. I made a few changes
> and bug fixes - http://swtch.com/Mail. The major
> drawback is that using mh commits you to one machine,
> unless you do some clever synchronization behind
> the scenes. I've been carrying my laptop around just to
> read mail, which I hadn't done in years. Anyway, I think
> that the Mail+mh was a useful experiment but is not
> a good long-term solution.
i've always used mh for mail on unix. i like it, as it gives you
many of the same benefits to having a fs interface to your mail
that upas/fs does.
tim
