Just curious. Anyone besides us at urjc tried omero? It has images, as well as bugs :-)
On 7/25/06, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think the ideal "browser" for plan 9 would be acme. if acme could handle a box-based layout with images and text, the "web browser" could consist of webfs, http/layout and http/acmectl. (giving acme the ability to display images inline with text would make replacing rio with acme more palatable.) - erik On Tue Jul 25 05:36:25 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If we were to formulate mozilla for an OS like Plan9 or Inferno, what > would be different in that software architecture? One can either > descend into the endless void of great possibilities, or truncate that > space at a first stage (it's just an HTTP client) and then start over > from scratch for a second (it's a world of multi-protocol clients). > Maintain sanity.
