On 6/29/07, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 13:49 -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:36:29PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >Okay folks, grabbed npfs and spfs from CVS.
>
> Might I suggest you try libixp instead of npfs? Aside from .u
> and auth, it does nearly everything that spfs does, only in
> about 1/10th the size, and with much clearer code, in my
> opinion. The API is based largely on lib9p. If you need
> something that it doesn't have (threading support?), it should
> be easy to add (I'd even be willing to add threading support, if
> you tell me the threading API to use).
>
> http://www.suckless.org/wiki/libs/libixp
Now I'm *completely* confused. ;-) So it seems that we have 4
choices: lib9client (part of Plan9 from userspace), npfs, spfs
and now libixp. Are they completely different? Under which
circumstances does each make the most sense?
There are many more choices, see http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations
uriel
