On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 13:49 -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:36:29PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > >Okay folks, grabbed npfs and spfs from CVS. > > Might I suggest you try libixp instead of npfs? Aside from .u > and auth, it does nearly everything that spfs does, only in > about 1/10th the size, and with much clearer code, in my > opinion. The API is based largely on lib9p. If you need > something that it doesn't have (threading support?), it should > be easy to add (I'd even be willing to add threading support, if > you tell me the threading API to use). > > http://www.suckless.org/wiki/libs/libixp
Now I'm *completely* confused. ;-) So it seems that we have 4 choices: lib9client (part of Plan9 from userspace), npfs, spfs and now libixp. Are they completely different? Under which circumstances does each make the most sense? Thanks, Roman.
