"jsnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Aug 23, 1:50 am, "Douglas A. Gwyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If .owners was enforced by the OS then why
>> couldn't it be attached in the usual namespace?
> Well, that could lead to a lot of 'reserved words' in the filesystem.

Probably it should be .attributes/owner, no new added word beyond
what would be needed for extended attributes anyway.

Reply via email to