On 9/1/07, Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With this way of thinking we will never catch up with lunix's 400 > syscalls (and counting, not to mention the ioctls)!
We're partly there in spirit; what fraction of the 4e kernel's system calls are there for backwards compatibility? ;) Back on topic, I wasn't proposing a readdir() syscall but pointing out that Douglas's suggestion would not in fact be painless or transparent under Plan 9. --Joel
