On Aug 29, 2:06 am, "Douglas A. Gwyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "jsnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > On Aug 23, 1:50 am, "Douglas A. Gwyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If .owners was enforced by the OS... > > ...that could lead to a lot of 'reserved words'... > > Probably it should be .attributes/owner, no new added word beyond > what would be needed for extended attributes anyway.
That's a good idea, and I think that brings us full circle. If we allow for a .attributes/content which is accepted by all the major tools, then what I want to do is done.
