Why not just port Version 7 f77 and Version 7 Ratfor?
On Mar 1, 2008, at 9:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
At work, most of the users need a fortran compiler (although almost
none of them actually use gfortran, they prefer ifort) and some of
them
do parallel computation so they need MPI. If I could have at least
those two items thanks to P9GCC, maybe I could convince some of
them to
work on the plan9 servers I'm slowly setting up there.
As for me, I'd be pretty happy if I could have a bittorrent client
(especially libtorrent/rtorrent, written in c++) on plan9 so it'd be
rather nice if your P9GCC could achieve building that. But yeah, that
one relies on auto*, configure, etc..
Mathieu.
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 06:55:06AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I apply some serious effort to bring P9GCC in line with the
latest release, I'd like to convince myself that the effort is worth
it. I'm keen to catch two birds with one stone: (a) make sure that
version 3.0 is sufficiently functional and (b) determine how
useful it
really is.
Please will anybody who has a Plan 9 objective that can only be
attained using GCC/G++ please drop me a line to let me know briefly
what it is? If the whole exercise gets a lot of support, I'll
happily
set up more infrastructure to deal with it (wiki, blog, remote
access,
whatever Bell Labs would rather not do themselves).
++L
PS: I prefer if you use the 9fans list, I may miss your mail if I
haven't already have entered your sender address in my whitelist.
Use
your discretion.
--
GPG key on subkeys.pgp.net:
KeyID: | Fingerprint:
683DE5F3 | 4324 5818 39AA 9545 95C6 09AF B0A4 DFEA 683D E5F3
--
